Was the criminal complaint filed by Ziarul Operativ against the Organized Crime Group “George Soros – Romania” and its accomplices “optimized” by Florian Coldea through the hands of his protégé, Patuleanu? According to our sources, the same Patuleanu is said to “optimize” several other sensitive cases, including those involving Bucharest Mayor Daniel Băluță and five major cases requested from DNA, with a total damage exceeding 60 million euros.
In the United States, George Soros is increasingly accused of financing actions that undermine the constitutional order, destabilize political balance, and support groups promoting an anti-national agenda disguised under the slogan of “civic activism.”
Documents and independent investigations have shown how Soros-funded networks influence the American justice system through “progressive” prosecutors, pressure NGOs, and coordinated media campaigns.
Romania is no exception. For over 35 years, the same mechanisms have operated here under the umbrella of philanthropy.
Through his foundations, Soros has built networks that have infiltrated education, media, politics, and — most dangerously — the justice system.
Behind a façade of reform, a parallel structure of influence and protection has taken root.
On September 8, 2025, Ziarul Operativ filed an official criminal complaint with DIICOT (the Directorate for Investigating Organized Crime and Terrorism) against the Organized Crime Group “George Soros – Romania” and its accomplices.
The complaint contains factual data, connections, and clear indications of activities that fall under criminal law.
And yet, to this day, DIICOT has not even issued a registration number for the case.
Why?
Because silence becomes a weapon when the law threatens those who manipulate it.
Because, according to judicial sources, the complaint may have been “optimized” — meaning blocked or diverted — under the influence of former general Florian Coldea, allegedly acting through his protégé, Patuleanu.
The same name, our sources claim, appears in other major cases as well, including those involving Bucharest Mayor Daniel Băluță and several files requested from DNA, with a total estimated damage of over 60 million euros.
If these reports prove accurate, this is not merely bureaucratic silence — it is evidence of a captured justice system.
In a true rule-of-law state, such a complaint would be investigated immediately.
In Romania, it is buried in silence — proof that truth hurts where the stakes are too high.
Romania deserves the truth.
And DIICOT must finally answer the question it keeps avoiding:
Does it remain silent because it cannot speak — or because it is not allowed to?
